It took 11 versions of her character to reach her final look. Character progression Animators used champagne bubbles and pinwheels as inspiration for Joy. Light and shade In-progress drawings of Joy and Sadness. Inside the mind Joy holding a 'core memory.
The editing process Notes written by animator Tony Fucile over a sketch of Sadness. Taking shape Sculptures are made of all Pixar's characters so that its creative team can view them in 3D. Lights, camera Animators created a digitised camera identical to a real one in order to 'film' each scene. Watch Amy Poehler and the film's directors on the making of Inside Out. Pixar's five biggest Kleenex moments. Monsters Inc Plot: The town of Monstropolis is powered by children's screams. Wall-E Plot: Wall-E is a dented old robot left alone on Earth to clean up the mess that human-kind left behind.
Up Plot: Accompanied by a freckle-faced boy, old grouch Carl embarks on the South American balloon adventure that his late wife always craved.
Toy Story 3 Plot: Toy Story was the film that launched Pixar as the new force of sophisticated animation.
If the skin looks too solid and no light gets in, it won't look natural. So animators used subsurface scattering to render skin. With subsurface scattering applied, skin no longer just looked like a rigid surface. They actually found inspiration for the skin in an unlikely place. The tools used to make the "Finding Nemo" fish look translucent were used to scatter light off the skin of humans here. But with these advancements, the studio never forgot that the skin couldn't look too realistic, despite the capabilities that the shader and the subsurface scattering now allowed.
If a human were to look too real, then they would enter into the realm of the disturbing uncanny valley. So while details like follicles and pores could have been added, they were purposely left out.
Pixar has been able to build convincing humans that don't follow all the basic rules of human anatomy throughout the years. For example, Carl Fredricksen from 's "Up. Skin and bone aren't the only things that make up a human. Pixar constantly strived to make humans more expressive.
By the time "Ratatouille" was in the works, Pixar would have controls just on a character's face. These controls allowed for the varying movement speeds between toys and humans in "Toy Story" and got even more sophisticated over the years, granting animators the ability to slow down and minimize the movements of an elderly character like Carl in "Up.
Meanwhile, Violet's long hair paved the way for Colette, who had , hairs on her head. Advanced simulations had to be applied to make sure strands would not merge into each other. Despite the sophistication of Colette's hair, Pixar still had hair challenges, specifically mastering curly hair.
According to Pixar's chief technology officer, Steve May, curly hair needs to be soft while still holding a curly shape. So in , simulation supervisor Claudia Chung and her team developed a new simulator called Taz for 's "Brave," which built Merida's hair as coil-like locks to imitate the movement of real curly hair. But the curls would completely unwind, so the animators added invisible core springs underneath them, allowing the locks to move with more control.
The better Pixar's animators got at creating humans, the easier it was for them to play around with their form and literally deconstruct them.
Animators were able to use the same rigs they would use for humans covered in flesh and muscle, but with some changes, as the bones needed to move in ways that you wouldn't normally see in human characters. For one, the skeletons were able to detach their bones, so the rigs were altered to allow for this.
A tool called Kingpin made the bones appear looser by adding jiggle to them, which you can see here. Pixar then put all the skin and muscle back on for "Incredibles 2," a sequel 14 years in the making. Even with all the strides made back in with the first "Incredibles," there was still so much more that Brad Bird and the animation team wanted to improve on. When the first movie came out, they didn't have the ability to get every single detail from the original clay sculpts of the characters.
Now they could. Toy Story, Since then, Pixar has made a great contribution to modern animation, transforming the animation world, and has grown from a little-known company to the most celebrated animation house in the world. So what is the secret of their success? There is one thing that makes Pixar movies so special: animators who work at the studio direct all of their creative energy toward crafting notable animation that presents the best stories possible.
They create these wonderful stories using science, math, and code. Pixar animators interweave art and science to create fantastic worlds where all the things you can ever imagine can become an exciting reality. There is no single movie studio whose animated films elicit more emotional responses than Pixar.
By now, Pixar has released 23 feature films, and some of them work better than others, but none of them is bad, and all of them were trying to present something special — an emotional ride, a technical achievement, or unforgettable characters. Some of them make you cry, others impress you with state-of-the-art visuals, and many of these must-see animated films just make you feel good with tales of friendships. One thing they discovered was that octopus tentacles don't bend but almost unfurl.
An engineer spent six months just getting the curve of one of his tentacles right, and this was even before they mastered his camouflage.
And as Pixar got better at developing the natural world, it also improved on the man-made world. By the time 's "Cars" came around, Pixar had about 1, times the computing power it did on "Toy Story.
As they did with the water in "Finding Nemo," they took time to make the light reflect off Lightning McQueen.
Those metal surfaces would then be rusted up and seen in 's "Wall-E," often considered one of Pixar's most visually stunning works. Then when "Ratatouille" rolled around in , Pixar combined its ability to work with fur from "Monsters, Inc.
Lighting is one of the most important factors in making CG animation look real. It takes a lot of rendering time to get it right. And it's not just one or two lights we're talking about.
This one shot alone in "Ratatouille" contained lights. But that's nothing. Jump ahead to 's "Coco. And even with a movie as visually ambitious as this one, something as simple as clothes can be the biggest challenge. A lot of the characters that wore clothes in "Coco" were actually skeletons.
The animators found that while simulating clothing, the cloth would often get caught between individual bones, creating a wedgie of sorts. For this, it implemented a technique called continuous collision detection, which allowed the animators to spot the clothes getting caught, even at moments where it was difficult to notice.
A year later, when the long-awaited "Incredibles 2" came out they were back to working with humans: skin, bones, and all. There was a year gap between the two "Incredibles" movies and the benefits of improved technology actually allowed them to make Jack-Jack look even cuter than he did in the first movie.
Twenty-four years after the original was released, it seems like this sequel is trying to do a lot of things the original just couldn't. The differences couldn't be more stark. While "Toy Story" used a 1. Now that Pixar had figured out how to put fur on one character and then hundreds more, it could make the animals in this movie eye-popping.
Compare that with Sid's dog in the original if you really want to know how far Pixar has come. Even just compare how much different it looks from the cat in "Coco.
0コメント